Published on February 19, 2004 By Jamie Burnside In Politics
I don't think that I am being contraversial if I were to say that gay marriage/ civil unions/ whatever is a divisive topic.

I would also feel safe to say that social liberals would be more likely to support of this type of thing than social conservatives. Let me also clarify that social liberals are more likely to vote Democrat, while social conservatives vote Republican.

Being such a divisive issue, I can't understand why any socially liberal groups would push this hot-button issue during an election year. Maybe I am not up on my current events, but if this whole contraversy is a reaction to something, then the catalyst was certainly well-timed.

In an election year, is it possible that the anti-gay vote is being energized by this recent series of contraversies? (I'd assume that President Bush would get most of that vote.) I smell a conspiracy.

Issues aside, I feel that the timing of this whole flap is a bit suspicious.

Comments
on Feb 19, 2004
While you may be right, and it's an interesting thought, there's also people who will be motivated on the far left to vote for Kerry, assuming he actually takes a stand on the issue. The far left, despite people claiming they have no one to vote for other than Kerry, are more than likely going to sit out this election, unless Kerry does something to energize them.

Cheers
on Feb 20, 2004
I totally agree, Jamie. This was started awhile ago by states who wanted to take a descriminatory law out of their lawbooks. The big flap is that conservative lawmakers have decided to try to add a descriminatory law to some constitutions (as well as the national).

I also believe the choice to push through these laws and amendments was timed for the Republican advantage.